The Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.

Introduction

Every year hundreds of thousands of people are diagnosed with cancer. To almost all of these people, the diagnosis of cancer is considered to be a guarantee of massive amounts of pain followed by almost certain death.

But such a diagnosis does not have to lead to any pain or even death. Some people, when they are diagnosed with cancer, have no fear of cancer and only consider cancer to be a minor nuisance!!

Why is it that some people greatly fear cancer and others consider cancer to be only a minor nuisance? The answer is information. Some people have good information about cancer and others have intentionally bad information about cancer.

How can you tell whether you have good information or bad information? Consider the source of the information and study the claims.

For example, the mass media receives many billions of dollars every year from the pharmaceutical industry in advertising revenues. Anyone who has not been living in a cave all their life knows that the media are very loyal to their major advertisers.

Thus, while you may think that everything you know about cancer comes from the media, in fact, everything you hear from the media about cancer actually comes from the pharmaceutical industry.

For example, the mass media tells everyone that there is no cure for cancer. The mass media also tells everyone that cancer is so complex that it will take many decades to find a cure for cancer.

These claims are nonsense. These are not the claims of people who are experts in cancer, these claims come from the pharmaceutical industry. The media is nothing but a mouthpiece for Big Pharma.

Also, you probably think that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is diligently seeking your best interests. Did it ever occur to you that what you hear about the FDA comes from the media. Because everything you hear from the media comes from the pharmaceutical industry, you can rest assured everything you hear about the FDA also comes from the pharmaceutical industry.

The pharmaceutical industry loves the FDA because in 1910 Congress assigned the FDA to be the police force of Big Pharma. Congress is also loyal to their major contributers!!

The prime purpose of the FDA is to shut down competitors of Big Pharma. But the media tells you that the prime purpose of the FDA is to shut down scam artists. Yes, there are scam artists among the competitors of Big Pharma, but there are also people who know how to cure cancer who are also shut down by the FDA!!

In other words, the FDA does not care whether someone knows how to cure cancer, the FDA shuts down everyone who cuts into the profits of the pharmaceutical industry, even if they know how to cure cancer.

The media, the FDA and Big Pharma are in the same bed, and the media is telling everyone that both the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA are watching out for your health. Hogwash. What they are doing is looking out for the profits of Big Pharma.

The fact is that cancer is easy to cure and the concept that there is no cure for cancer and that a cure for cancer is decades away are both totally false and are driven by the pharmaceutical industry.

There are, in fact, two totally different worlds of information. These two worlds might as well be on different planets. One world of information is owned and controlled by Big Business. The other world of information is controlled by people who are outside of Big Business and who care about other people.

In one world, cancer is easy to cure. In the other world, cancer is impossible to cure and it will be many decades before there is even a partial cure for cancer. In this world, everyone is told that cancer is a chronic disease because there is no cure.

The media, Congres and the FDA (and the American Cancer Society, which is controlled by oncologists) are all on the world of the pharmaceutical industry. It is a fantasy world which was created by the media.

It is very unfortunate that you have to hear these things from a non-profit company. Believe me, we wish we could avoid these types of discussions, but the fact is that you would never believe a thing we say if we didn't deal with the issue of the media first.

But what is really unfortunate is that over 95% of the cancer patients who visit this website have already had extensive cancer treatments and many of them have been sent home to die. The Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc. (ICRF) is well aware that almost all cancer patients who visit this site have already had extensive chemotherapy, radiation and probably surgery.

Our research is focused on people who have already had extensive cancer treatments. We have had great success finding highly effective treatments for this group of cancer patient!!

In fact, more than 50% of the cancer patients who have been given-up on by their doctors can survive their cancer if they are willing to do a lot of reading.

What Is The Truth?

There are two basic categories of cancer treatments in the world. First, are the "orthodox" cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. Second, are the "natural" or "alternative" cancer treatments.

Most people think that orthodox cancer treatments are more effective because they are far more toxic and powerful, therefore people assume they are far more potent at treating cancer.

Let us compare cancer to a mosquito. Suppose a mosquito lands on the wall in your living room. Suppose you have two choices to kill it. First, you can throw a bowling ball at the mosquito and hope it kills the mosquito. Second, you can use a cheap, flimsy flyswatter. Which would you use?

There are two major problems with using the bowling ball. First, it is very difficult to aim the bowling ball at the mosquito. Second is that whether you are successful or not at killing the mosquito, you are going to make a big impression on your wall. However, you may want to use the bowling ball because it is strong and powerful compared to a flyswatter.

Who would want to use the flyswatter; it is so wimpy compared to the bowling ball? Someone might want to use the flyswatter because it will not damage their wall and they can easily aim it at the mosquito. In fact, the flyswatter was designed specifically to kill small insects without damaging your walls.

In exactly a similar way, like the bowling ball, orthodox cancer treatments are big and powerful but they do not target cancer cells and thus they do major harm to the cancer patient without curing their cancer!!

On the other hand, while alternative cancer treatments are not powerful and toxic, they either target cancer cells or they do no harm to non-cancerous cells. Thus, alternative cancer treatments can be used in much higher doses than orthodox cancer treatments!!

The net result is that while you may think that alternative cancer treatments are wimpy, the fact is that they are far, far more potent at treating cancer than orthodox cancer treatments because they can be used in much higher doses!!

The truth is that alternative cancer treatments have cured many, many people after they have been sent home to die by orthodox medicine. Ponder that carefully.

The problem with chemotherapy is that it is so toxic that it kills far more healthy cells than cancerous cells. And while it may seem chemotherapy is given in high doses, in fact it is given in very low doses. If someone were to try to kill all the cancer cells in a person's body with chemotherapy the patient would die long before all the cancer cells would die.

Using radiation on a spreading cancer is like using a 30-06 rifle to put out a carpet fire.

Using surgery on a spreading cancer is like going into a burning house and removing a charred couch from a house which is still on fire and the fire is still spreading.

Nothing in orthodox medicine can cure cancer and nothing in orthodox medicine can stop the spread of cancer.

But there are existing alternative cancer treatments which can cure a high percentage of cancer cases and which can stop a spreading cancer.

The result is that the overall cure rate of orthodox medicine is less than 3%. Neither chemotherapy, radiation nor surgery can kill all the cancer cells in a person's body. In reality, the 3% cure rate of orthodox medicine is deceptively high because the oncologist-controlled American Cancer Society uses a deceptive definition of "cure rate" and it uses a deceptive definition of "cancer" to make orthodox cancer treatments look better than they really are.

What is the true cure rate of alternative medicine? The answer to this question depends on a number of factors. But the biggest factor is whether the person had orthodox cancer treatments prior to starting their alternative cancer treatments.

If twenty of the top alternative cancer treatment experts were given 1,000 newly diagnosed cancer patients who had at least 3 months to live, they could easily achieve a 95% true cure rate, without using any tricky definitions. Orthodox medicine would have a true cure rate of less than 3% on these same patients.

Dr. William D. Kelley, a dentist turned alternative cancer treatment guru, had more than a 90% cure rate on newly diagnosed cancer patients. By using his treatment plus adding newer and much more potent products than Dr. Kelley had access to, a 95% true cure rate would be easy to achieve.

But this is the ideal. The reality is that almost every cancer patient who uses alternative cancer treatments has already had extensive orthodox cancer treatments and is in serious or critical condition before they even begin their alternative cancer treatment.

To make matters worse, most of these patients are not able to find the best of the best of the alternative cancer treatments because of the vast size of the Internet compared to the very small number of top-notch alternative cancer treatment web sites. Of those who do find these key websites within a few weeks of starting to look, they typically have about a 50% to 60% chance of surviving their cancer.

The four key factors to survival are:
1) What kind of cancer is it,
2) How much time did they lose using orthodox cancer treatments,
3) How much damage did the orthodox treatments do, and
4) After they quit their orthodox cancer treatment, how long did it take them to find one of the most potent alternative cancer treatments.

If alternative cancer treatments look ineffective it is because most cancer patients who use alternative cancer treatments already have one foot in the grave and they use the wrong treatment for their situation because they could not find or recognize a potent treatment for their situation.

There are also a few orthodox cancer treatments which have very high cure rates, such as Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT), which has been in continuous use for more than 75 years. However, very few medical doctors are allowed to use the highly effective protocols.

So if alternative cancer treatments (and even some orthodox cancer treatments) are far, far more effective than the commonly used orthodox cancer treatments, why do more than 99% of all newly diagnosed cancer patients begin their treatment with the ineffective orthodox cancer treatments?

The answer to this question is that the general public is intentionally given poor information about cancer treatments. The reason for the intentionally poor information is a paradox in medicine. A clear understanding of the paradox could save your life or the life of a loved one. The paradox will be discussed in detail below.

About the Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.

The Independent Cancer Research Foundation (ICRF) is one of the extremely rare world-class cancer research organizations which focuses solely on researching natural cancer treatments, more commonly referred to as "alternative cancer treatments."

The ICRF was founded and is controlled by individuals who have a long history of being loyal to natural medicine research. Collectively, the board members have more than 30 years of experience researching and working with alternative cancer treatments. The members are hand-picked experts at treating cancer with natural substances or with very low amperage electromedicine.

While there are many cancer researchers in the world, very few of them can find a cure for cancer without having it crushed by corporate interests who are looking only for higher profits. The ICRF is not in any way under the thumb of any corporate interests, thus we are free to find many cures for cancer over and above the ones we already know about.

But that is not all. Orthodox cancer research is controlled by huge amounts of money which is controlled by people and organizations who want to make even more money. Thus, funding for finding the real cause of cancer is non-existent. For example, DNA damage does not cause cancer.

The ICRF is well aware of what causes cancer, and all of its "research treatments" (which are linked to below) are based on defeating the real cause of cancer; which is a highly pleomorphic "cell wall deficient" bacteria. It was actually an ICRF researcher who developed the model of "how" the pleomorphic microbes cause a healthy cell to change into a cancer cell (the article is linked to below under the title of "Cancer Theory").

This real cause of cancer has been known about for more than a hundred years (though the terminology has changed over the years). Only electromedicine treatments have been shown to actually cure cancer by addressing the cause of cancer (e.g. Dr. Royal Rife).

The ICRF is looking for both electromedicine and non-electromedicine treatments to cure cancer because by killing the microbe(s) (which are inside the cancer cell) the cancer cells can revert back into normal cells. There are significant advantages to reverting a cancer cell into a normal cell rather than killing the cancer cells.

But most alternative cancer treatments are not based on solid cancer theory, rather they are based on trial and error. Alternative practitioners simply use "what works." There is certainly nothing wrong with using treatments which work!!

There are more than 400 alternative cancer treatments that are well documented. Several dozen of these treatments are highly effective cures, for most types of cancer, but they are cures for only "recently diagnosed" cancer patients who have not had extensive orthodox treatments, such as chemotherapy.

Only about a dozen of these treatments are highly effective for advanced cancer patients.

With this in mind, and if these cures are public information, why the need for the ICRF?

The research objectives of the ICRF are focused on helping advanced cancer patients, many of whom have been sent home to die by orthodox medicine. It is a universal constant that 95% of the cancer patients who seek out alternative cancer treatments have already had extensive chemotherapy, radiation and surgery.

This kind of cancer patient is not only vulnerable to their cancer, but they are equally vulnerable to death caused by the damage done to their immune system, their non-cancerous cells (their so-called "healthy" cells), and so on.

The focus of ICRF research is on treatments which hopefully will not cause additional inflammation or swelling and will:
1) Protect with super-nutrients the non-cancerous cells,
2) Stop the spreading of cancer, and
3) Kill existing cancer cells or revert them into normal cells.

The ICRF board members already know how to do all of these things and are spreading the word about existing treatments for advanced cancer patients. Three of the board members have websites on alternative cancer treatments. In fact, the premiere website on the Internet on alternative cancer treatments (because it "rates" alternative cancer treatments based on their effectiveness on advanced cancer patients) was written by one of the board members of the ICRF (Webster Kehr wrote the Cancer Tutor website).

Furthermore, two of the most potent alternative cancer treatments for advanced cancer patients were designed by ICRF board members:
The Cellect-Budwig Protocol by Mike Vrentas
The Bill Henderson Protocol by Bill Henderson
Also, Gary Teal was responsible for "picking the brain" of the person who designed a superb new alternative cancer treatment which uses a frequency generator (i.e. a "Rife Machine").

Detailed information about these three treatments, and the other most potent alternative cancer treatments can be found on the Cancer Tutor website. This ICRF website is for research purposes (i.e. treatments being researched) so it does not discuss the highly "proven" treatments which are on the Cancer Tutor website.

(Note: Due to the concerns of the IRS with potential conflicts of interest, non-profit organizations are not allowed to link to the websites of their board members or top officers, thus the ICRF is not allowed to link directly to the Cancer Tutor website or other websites owned by board members. This restriction is in force in spite of the fact that the vast majority of the cancer treatment articles on the Cancer Tutor website are in no way associated with ICRF board members!! You will have find the "Cancer Tutor" website using a search engine such as Google.)

The Cancer Tutor website, while it is the repository of the ICRF "proven" treatments (and dozens of other "proven" treatments), is definitely not the only excellent website on alternative cancer treatments. Here is an article which links to many of the top alternative cancer treatment websites:
Links to Many Top Cancer Research Websites

It should also be understood that because of FDA persecution of competitors of the pharmaceutical industry, that there are many cures for cancer which vendors of the key products are not allowed to talk about. Thus, you may find a website which sells a product which cures or treats cancer, but yet the site is not allowed to talk about the cure because of fear of FDA persecution!!

The importance of the websites which do not directly sell any health products cannot be overestimated because they are the only websites which are allowed to talk about effective cures for cancer!!!

The truth is that because the ICRF is one of the rare organizations which is actually looking for cancer cures and effective cancer treatments, the treatments we have developed are vastly superior to orthodox treatments. Furthermore, our vast superiority over "orthodox" cancer charities and government research happened during a time when the funding of the ICRF was less than 1/100,000th of 1% of all the other organizations!!

Do not misunderstand that statistic. The ICRF needs very significant funding to continue its research goals! The ICRF not only researches cancer, but also other diseases which have a similar cause or similar type of treatment (e.g. Lyme Disease, AIDS, Parkinson's, Multiple Sclerosis, etc.). If you or a loved one gets Lyme Disease or M.S. or Parkinson's - where will you turn to?? Think about that after you read the paradox!!

The Paradox in Medicine

The typical cancer patient who uses orthodox cancer treatments will spend about $350,000 for their treatment and will die. Orthodox cancer treatments are very, very profitable to medical doctors, hospitals, the pharmaceutical industry, the "health" insurance companies, the politicians (e.g. government agencies), the media, etc.

Orthodox cancer treatments are desgined to make a cancer patient a "long term profit center," meaning cancer treatments are designed not to treat cancer, but to turn cancer into yet another "chronic disease."

But the key entity which makes massive amounts of money on cancer patients is the pharmaceutical industry. It is this industry which uses their money to "buy" the favors of the media and many, many other entities. The most important use of this money is to gain the favors of the media (to control information in the media) and to gain the favors of the government agencies (which suppress information outside of the media and harass or arrest those who know how to cure disease). The FDA, like most government agencies, is nothing but the police force of a corporate cartel (i.e. the large pharmaceutical companies - Big Pharma). The FDA is the way Congress pays Big Pharma for their bribes - a free police force paid for by the government.

Patients who make cancer treatment decisions do so on the basis of what they have heard (or not heard) in the mass media. It is the mass media which controls, directly and indirectly, the information people use to choose between orthodox cancer treatments or alternative cancer treatments.

The media makes TENS OF BILLIONS of dollars every year from the pharmaceutical industry and other orthodox medicine related industries.

The primary reason, by a wide margin, that the media glorifies ineffective orthodox cancer treatments is because of a paradox in medicine. This paradox is a direct result of two key facts.

Fact #1: Cancer is a trillion dollar disease to modern medicine because there is a great deal of money in treating cancer as a chronic disease while they pretend there are no cures for cancer and they pretend to be looking for a cure for cancer.

Therefore, those people who have no interest in curing cancer, because curing cancer cuts into their profits, have many, many, many billions of dollars to control the White House (e.g. the FDA, FTC, FCC, etc. appointments), Congress, buy the loyalty of the mass media, etc. etc. For example, any presidential candidate who is not acceptable to the corporate cartels is effectively blacklisted by the media to insure they are not elected (the media itself is a giant cartel which has its own police force - the FCC).

Fact #2: There is very little money in curing cancer with alternative cancer treatments, and there is even less money in telling people how to cure their cancer at home. Thus, the people who know how to cure cancer don't have the money to proactively spread the news about how to cure cancer because there is very little money in curing cancer and thus they don't have the money to buy television and/or radio advertisements, control the corrupt government agencies, etc. Thus the media and government agencies ignore alternative medicine and knowingly give false information about alternative cancer treatments!!

While these two facts are interesting, the paradox results from these two statements.

The Paradox in Medicine:
Because the media are whores who sell-out to the highest bidder; the information that is heard by the general public is totally controlled by the people with the most money and the people with the most money have the most money because they have the least concern for human life. Thus, all of the information you hear about cancer comes from those who love your money but have absoutely no concern for your life!!

If you do not clearly understand this paradox you will have almost no chance of surviving your cancer because you will continue to believe what you hear in the media and you will continue to use orthodox cancer treatments!! Understanding this paradox is the first step in the healing process and has been the first step for many decades.

This paradox is why, when you watch television, you see medical doctor shows (by deifying medical doctors they are glorifying drugs), hospital shows, pharmaceutical ads, etc. every time you turn on your television. That is why the vast majority of people have no clue that alternative cancer treatments are far superior to orthodox cancer treatments.

What is the significance of this paradox? The significance is that cancer will always be a chronic disease and there will never be any new cures for cancer found (by orthodox medicine) because it would cut into their vast fortunes to actually cure cancer.

The money received by pretending there is no cure for cancer is why the oncologist-controlled American Cancer Society has a billion dollars of funds to convince people to send them money so they can divert money from people who know how to cure cancer and who are looking for even more effective cures for cancer.

That is why organizations like the American Cancer Society count their contributions in the hundreds of millions of dollars and why organizations like the ICRF count their contributions in the hundreds of dollars.

One of the things we want to do at the ICRF is have staff to answer emails of cancer patients to give them suggestions on which alternative cancer treatment is best for their situation. But the ICRF does not even have enough money to hire a single part-time staff member to answer emails.

Don't ever forget there is very little money in curing cancer and thus the media will never say anything good about effective alternative cancer treatments. If you don't understand this paradox it could cost you your life or the life of a loved one!!

The paradox is real and actually applies to many diseases for which there are already cures.

The Goals of the ICRF

But there is another aspect of this paradox which involves the FDA. There are already cures for cancer, Lyme Disease, AIDS, etc. which we at the ICRF cannot talk about. Why can't we talk about them? The reason is that the treatments are not protected from FDA destruction. If we talked about them the FDA could shut them down before they were protected.

In other words, we at the ICRF (and a few other small alternative research organizations), are in a race with the FDA to find and protect technologies before the FDA can find them and destroy them.

Thus, we really don't even have to look for new cures for cancer, all we need to do is protect already existing technologies so they can be made public.

Here are two more facts. First, if every person who visited this website contributed $25 to our research, some of the less expensive technologies could be protected. Second, if those with the financial ability contribute several thousand dollars each, we could start protecting the more expensive protocols.

"Protecting" a technology involves four steps:
1) We have to acquire a technology which we have solid reasons to believe is very effective,
2) We have to test it to determine whether it works and we have to learn how to use it,
3) We have to document the technology and spread this information to organizations similar to the ICRF,
4) Then we can make the technology public.

Note the first item requires money which we don't have. If the FDA (or its Canadian equivalent) shuts down a technology before we can study it, it is likely gone forever.

More About the ICRF

Yes, the ICRF is doing primary, meaning original, cancer research. However, we are equally interested in protecting existing technologies. It makes no sense to spend money developing new technologies if the FDA is destroying existing technologies faster than you are finding new technologies. That, in fact, is exactly what has been going on since 1910.

Nevertheless, even with very, very limited funds, mostly our own, we continue to do primary research on alternative cancer treatments.

Our financial needs also include an office and a part time or full time office manager to answer emails/questions from cancer patients, handle company business, keep the websites of the ICRF up to date, track down promising technologies, make appointments, coordinate research projects, etc.

Should those involved with the ICRF find one or more cures that meet the requirements they are looking for, the focus of the organization may switch from research to making this information public. Once the information is disseminated to their satisfaction, most likely the organization will be dissolved and only the websites will remain active.

Who Are the Members of the Board of Directors

Here are the current officers and members of the Board of Directors:

R. Webster Kehr, President, author of the Cancer Tutor website. Webster lives in Kansas.

Mike Vrentas, Vice President - Treasurer, who with his wife Cherie, run a small natural medicine website. Mike lives in Missouri.

Bill Henderson, Vice President - Secretary, is the author of a major book on alternative cancer treatments. He is also the author of a major website on cancer and has a weekly Internet radio show. Bill lives in California.

Dr. William Wassell, M.D., Vice President, is active in Vitamin C research (i.e. orthomolecular medicine) and provides technical support for alternative cancer researchers. Dr. Wassell lives in Louisiana.

Gary Teal, Board Member, is an expert in acupuncture, electromedicine and general alternative cancer treatments. Gary lives in Utah.

Collectively, the members of the board have more than 30 years of alternative cancer treatment research. All of them want to see cancer cured and all of them have made contributions to that end.

How Do I Contribute to the ICRF?

The ICRF is a non-profit corporation, incorporated in the state of Nevada. The ICRF is tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and is classified as a "public charity" [170(b)(1)(A)(vi)]. Those who make contributions to the ICRF may take a tax-deduction under Section 170 of the Code. The advance ruling is valid until December 31, 2010, at which time it must be renewed.

The tax number of the ICRF is: 20-4461836

Contributions are greatly appreciated and can be sent to:

Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.
P.O. 2074
Lees Summit, MO 64063

To email the ICRF:
Email ICRF